By Sunday Apah
Ayo Fayose, the former Governor of Ekiti State, has raised concerns following the recent Supreme Court ruling that supports the direct allocation of monthly funds from the federation account to local governments.
A prominent member of the Peoples Democratic Party, Fayose highlighted that despite the court’s decision, obstacles to local government autonomy persist due to the actions of state Houses of Assembly and governors.
Speaking as a guest on Sunday’s edition of Channels Television’s Politics Today, Fayose pointed out the inherent challenges in achieving true local government autonomy. He emphasized that without the backing of a governor, it is practically impossible for anyone from the grassroots to become a local government chairman. In his view, both the judiciary and the Federal Government cannot fully enforce local government autonomy.
Expressing his viewpoint, Fayose stated, “While I may not be a lawyer but a seasoned politician and an elder statesman by God’s grace, I firmly advocate against any form of government interference in local government funds distribution. It is important to understand that you cannot separate the local government from the state government. The local government chairman’s position is intricately tied to the governor’s support. Any suggestion otherwise is futile.”
Fayose further elaborated on the control mechanisms in place, noting that during his tenure as governor, funds were channeled from Abuja, managed by non-political entities separate from the council chairman and politicians. He highlighted the role of the House of Assembly in overseeing and regulating local government activities.
He concluded by questioning the true extent of power being delegated to local governments, emphasizing the current complexities and limitations within the system.
The PDP chieftain expressed his concerns about the lack of commitment among state lawmakers and council officials. He highlighted the issue of council officials not taking their responsibilities seriously, citing instances where many workers fail to show up for work on certain days of the week.
He emphasized the importance of respect for the governor within the local government system, stating that any council chairperson who disregards the governor’s authority is likely to face consequences from the House of Assembly. He explained that the House of Assembly oversees the activities of council chairpersons and ensures compliance with governance protocols.
The chieftain observed a significant absence of local government staff during council meetings on Wednesdays and Fridays, estimating that less than 10% of the workforce is present at the office. He challenged anyone to dispute this claim, emphasizing the prevalent lack of work ethic among local government employees. He criticized the tendency for NULGE and local government leaders to intervene on behalf of non-performing staff when attempts are made to hold them accountable.
In comparing the administrative efficiency of the state government to that of the local government, he noted a stark difference, alleging that many individuals working in the local government prioritize financial gain over fulfilling their duties. He pointed out instances where individuals have relocated from their assigned states yet continue to receive salaries, illustrating the systemic issues within the local government structure.